Capitalism has specially fascinated me in recent past. The fascination had been such that I have believed that capitalism is an approach where we realize futility of running behind all the comforts and all the need hierarchies. If there are other economic models too that help you approach this realization, than capitalism seems to work faster. My feeling had been that the possibility of realizing that need hierarchy under a socialistic and other type of economic systems is lower compared to capitalism. This impression is based on visits to certain cities of developed – mostly – capitalistic economies.
My opinions may be incorrect, as repeatedly pointed out in comments by Ramana uncleji. I am still analyzing why I may be incorrect in the sense that capitalism a better approach to move towards spirituality compared to other systems.
One recent incident helped me evaluate my premise bit more. I was collecting donations for an NGO – DSY. The plan was to collect about 1 lac Indian rupee within 5 days before 25th Dec. Some unexpected mail, call and chats resulted in donations. I was confident of other close friends to donate – they did not! It was utter surprise to me. I am not asking money for myself, I am giving financial details of the organization and I am also showing the work the organization has done, yet the closest of my friends are uncomfortable to donate. Impact of two of the projects are below –
Some of my friends are MBAs and others are Engineers working in respectable organizations. They are well to do, yet they were unwilling to donate. What was the problem with them to even commit INR 1000 or say INR 5000? In fact I told a few of them if you donate INR 5000 or more you will get tax deduction under section 80G of Income tax too. The question I had in my mind was – if someone can spend few thousands on New Year eve, cannot someone commit that much or lesser for someone else? The money can help a farmer stay alive, not commit suicide or a tribal child study. Why so? Have we become so callous? Are we less compassionate in the influence of capitalism?
Answer to the question and my recent analysis was – in many cases today’s capitalism is a constant feeling of “having less” and “willingness to have more”. I’ve been writing about this desire for more, constant running behind many things in past. I felt that it’ll get subdued over period of time under capitalism. Prosperity will help a person view futility of this constant race to get more. Because over a period of time an individual will start questioning own’s running – why? What more? Resulting in realizing futility of this rat race sooner rather than later.
Abundance possibly is based on our sense that “I already have things in abundant supply”. Possibly, we’ll have some different economic model in future, not exactly capitalism; where contentment will be primary and give will be preferred over feeling of paucity depravity and wanting for more.
Last not the least – I’ve extended my targets to 2 lac. By 31st March 2018 you can donate at https://www.dsyindia.org/login.php. Once you donate please share the acknowledgement with me so that I know how far I’m from my targets.
Start the new year by giving. Wish you a Very Happy New Year. I hope few of you will think of donating besides wonderful celebration of the coming year.
Image source – http://mike-ward.net/donate/
Related blogs – Education, Chicken in the “poultry farm of economy”, Race – never ending, What more you need?, When will we stop?, Swasthay – dwelling in oneself, Money worth earning, A cup of tea
2 Comments
Ramana Rajgopaul · December 29, 2017 at 5:52 pm
Your Uncleji again takes exception. Capitalism has got nothing to do with wanting or not wanting to give. Recently there has been enough matter in our media to highlight how our Capitalists have been giving away their fortunes as well as well known cases of Western capitalists who have been doing the same for decades.
Willingness to give or not comes from within each individual. If you had asked me for a donation I would have said no because, I am already committed to other charities and what way would my inclination towards capitalism been responsible for this denial?
No economic ism is responsible for individual choices.
KRD Pravin · January 4, 2018 at 12:19 pm
Yes that is what has been my lesson. Hoarding or having money is not necessarily the guarantee of a person donating. At the same time, one can give only if one has the thing. Isnt it? Capitalism has given us a count of 99, where we run to make it a 100. I am hopeful that we sooner or later will learn to be content at 99 (http://business2buddha.com/2011/07/06/when-will-we-stop/ and http://business2buddha.com/2011/06/06/cogito-ergo-sum/). I thought that some of my friends who can donate will donate, but their unwillingness had nothing to do with their current possession! There is no end to owning more. We are no different (wish soon we will be an example of being different) http://business2buddha.com/2015/08/05/we-are-no-different-up-or-down/ and look at donating instead of always looking for owning up things http://business2buddha.com/2015/01/26/owning-up-things/ and possession – http://business2buddha.com/2017/06/19/angels-and-demons-possession/